The function horizon in gravity is a bit different from the function horizon in magnetism. Essentially, an old college function horizon is created when gravity becomes so best that light cannot escape. The magnetic function horizon is different, but it has force acting in 3 directions depending within the charge regarding the particles when compared to an function horizon created by gravity bending space-time and acting in only one direction. The benefit to us is that we can rip apart any known structure created of charged particles, which includes molecules, atoms, subatomic particles, and maybe even quarks. Without going straight into the how, energy-in - energy-out, or an efficiency debate, the magnetic function horizon varies depending on what you can be ripping apart.
There exists different magnetic function horizons for ripping apart the nucleus of atoms, seperating the electrons from the nucleus of an atom, and ripping apart subatomic particles. Each function horizon is defined by the maximum no. of force compulsory to accomplish each goal. Due to the fact that the field acts in 3 directions instead of one, it is more efficient than a gravitational field. It also creates it feasible to liberate the tough nuclear force, which means being can turn anything, even waste into fuel that burns 100,000 times hotter than similar no.
of radioactive fabric used in nuclear power. This means access to nearly unlimited life and no more dependence on fossil fuels. To address the energy-in - energy-out question: a black hole exhibits an enormous force and does work, yet it's the property regarding the gravitation field that does the work. The energy-in can remain constant forever and it shall still do work yet no life is consumed within the process. No reason how many trillion years you watch an isolated black hole, it shall not ever stop or dimish its pull on the outside world.
Therefore, fields can work without consuming energy. So you are probably thinking, how does this guy suggest we make an extremely powerful magnetic field that is neither highly efficient or 100% efficient? First we begin with a toroid-shaped accelerator with a vacuum inside. We place electrons within the vacuum and we have 3 choices. Neither we use an electrically repulsive force to hold the spinning electrons from hitting the walls or we use an equivalent no. of gravitational force like a moon or star to pull them towards the center.
The velocity regarding the electrons shall neither be limited by the repulsive force regarding the electrical charge on the inside walls regarding the toroid or the gravity regarding the object being used to confine them or a combination of both. The spinning of these electrons should be increased to near the velocity of light over time with an equivalent no. of force holding them back. The spinning within the vacuum creates no heat or friction. The field basically exists and acts on everything in it.
If we are creating use of electricity to confine the electrons, then some heat should be lost. However, I figured out a method to eliminate that challenge too with some more engineering. It's just too many facts for the scope of this paper. Just think about that this field is liberating an obsene no. of tough nuclear life or electrons and the electrons in it shall even seperate into up-quarks and down-quarks if it's generating a powerful enough function horizon to liberate the tough nuclear force.
A mini portion regarding the life released shall be used to maintain or strengthen the field. The rest shall be stored in devices that maintain a magnetic envelope tough enough to hold the energy.
No comments:
Post a Comment