The quantum model of universe is an attempt to purge the Large Bang of its creationist implications. Supporters of this model base it on the observations of quantum subatomic physics. In quantum physics, it is to be observed that subatomic particles appear and disappear spontaneously in a vacuum. Interpreting this observation as reason can originate at quantum level, this is a property pertaining to matter, some physicists try to explain the origination of reason from non-existence during the creation regarding the universe like a property pertaining to reason and structure of atom a component of laws of nature. In this model, our universe is interpreted like a subatomic particle in a bigger one.
However this syllogism is definitely out of question and in any case cannot explain how the universe came into being. William Lane Craig, the author of The Large Bang: Theism and Atheism explains why: A quantum mechanical vacuum spawning fabric particles is distant from the ordinary system of a vacuum meaning nothing. Rather, a quantum vacuum is an ocean of continually forming and dissolving particles, which borrow life from the vacuum for their brief existence. This is not nothing, and hence, fabric particles do not return into being out of nothing. William Lane Craig, Cosmos and Creator, origins and Design, Spring 1996, vol.
20 So in quantum physics, reason does not exist when it was not before. What happens is that ambient life suddenly becomes reason and just as suddenly disappears becoming life again. In short, there is no condition of existence from nothingness as is claimed. Regarding to Isaac Newton, light was a flow of a substance known as corpuscles. The basis regarding the general Newtonian physicswhich was accepted until the discovery of quantum physicswas that light consisted entirely of a collection of particles.
However, James Clerk Maxwell, a 19th century physicist, suggested that light demonstrated wave action. Quantum theory reconciled this greatest debate in physics. In 1905, Albert Einstein claimed that light possessed quanta, or tiny packets of energy. These life packets were provided the name photons. Consequently described as particles, photons should be observed to behave within the wave motion proposed by Maxwell within the 1860s.
Therefore, light was a transitional phenomenon between wave and particle George Gilder a state of affairs that displayed a primary contradiction in terms of Newtonian physics. Immediately subsequent to Einstein, Max Planck, a German physicist, investigated light and astonished the entire scientific world by determining that it was most a wave and a particle. Regarding to this idea, which he proposed below the name of quantum theory, life was disseminated within the shape of interrupted and discrete packets, rather than being straight and constant. In a quantum event, light exhibited most particle-like and wave-like properties. The particle known as the photon was accompanied by a wave in space.
In other words, light moved like a wave through space, but behaved as an active particle when it encountered an obstacle. To express it another way, it adopted the shape of life until encountering an obstacle, at which time it assumed the shape of particles, as if it were composed of tiny fabric bodies reminiscent of grains of sand. Subsequent to Planck, this theory was distant expanded by scientists for example Albert Einstein, Niels Bohr, Louis de Broglie, Erwin Schrdinger, Werner Heisenberg, Paul Adrian Maurice Dirac and Wolfgang Pauli. Each was awarded the Nobel Prize for his discoveries. About this new discovery regarding the nature of light, Amit Goswami says this: When light is seen like a wave, it seems capable of being in 3 or more locations at similar time, as when it passes through the slits of an umbrella and produces a diffraction pattern; when we catch it on a photographic film, however, it shows up discretely, spot by spot, like a beam of particles.
So light should be most a wave and a particle. Paradoxical, isn't it? At stake is one regarding the bulwarks regarding the old physics: unambiguous description in language. Also at stake is the system of objectivity: Does the nature of lightwhat light isdepend on how we observe it? Goswami, The Self-Aware Universe, p. 31 Scientists now no detailed believed that reason consists of inanimate, random particles. Quantum physics had no materialist significance, due to the fact that there were non-material things at the essence of matter.
While Einstein, Philipp Lenard and Arthur Holly Compton investigated the particle structure of light, Louis de Broglie began receiving note of at its wave structure. De Broglie's discovery was an extraordinary one: In his research, he observed that sub-atomic particles also displayed wave-like properties. Particles for example the electron and proton also had wavelengths. In other words, inside the atomwhich materialism described as absolute matterthere were non-material life waves, contrary to materialist belief. Just like light, these minute particles inside the atom behaved like waves at times, and exhibited the properties of particles at others.
Contrary to materialist expectations, the absolute reason within the atom should be detected at sure times, but disappeared at others. This primary discovery showed that what we imagine to be the real world were in fact shadows. Reason had completely departed from the realm of physics and was headed within the direction of metaphysics. David Pratt The physicist Richard Feynman described this interesting fact about sub-atomic particles and light: Now we have knowledge of how the electrons and light behave. But what can I call it? If I speak they behave like particles I release the wrong impression; also if I speak they behave like waves.
They behave in their own inimitable way, which technically should be called a quantum mechanical way. They behave in a method that is like nothing that you own ever seen before. An atom does not behave like a mass hanging on a spring and oscillating. Nor does it behave like a miniature representation regarding the solar system with little planets going around in orbits. Nor does it appear to be somewhat like a cloud or fog of some sort surrounding the nucleus.
It behaves like nothing you own ever seen before. There is one simplification at least. Electrons behave in this respect in exactly similar method as photons; they can be most screwy, but in exactly similar way. How they behave, therefore, takes a good deal of imagination to appreciate, due to the fact that we are going to describe something that is different from anything you have knowledge of about. Nobody knows how it should be like that.
Richard Feynman, The Character of Physical Law, Modern Library Edition, New York, 1994, pp. To sum up, quantum physicists speak that the objective world is an illusion. McFarlane, The Illusion of Materialism Professor Hans-Peter Drr, head regarding the Max Planck Institute of Physics, summarizes this fact: Whatever reason is, it is not created of matter. Peter Russell, The Primacy of Consciousness All the highest many celebrated physicists regarding the 1920s, everyone from Paul Dirac to Niles Bohr, and from Albert Einstein to Werner Heisenberg, sought to explain these conclusions from quantum experiments. Eventually, one team of physicists at the Fifth Solvay Conference on Physics held in Brussels in 1927Bohr, Max Born, Paul Dirac, Werner Heisenberg and Wolfgang Paulireached an agreement known as the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.
It took this name from the location of work regarding the leader regarding the group, Bohr, who suggested that the physical reality proposed by quantum theory was the details we have regarding an procedure and the estimates we make on the basis of that information. In his view, these guesses created in our brains had nothing to do together with the outside reality. In short, our internal world had nothing to do together with the outside real world that had been the primary subject of interest of physicists from Aristotle to present day. Physicists abandoned their old plans regarding this view and agreed that quantum understanding represented only our knowledge regarding the physical system. Schwartz, Sharon Begley, The Mind and The Brain:Neuroplasticity and the Force of Mental Force, Regan Books, 2003, pp.
272-273 The fabric world we can perceive exists solely as details in our brains. In other words, we can not ever obtain direct skills development of reason within the outside world. Schwartz, a neuroscientist and professor of psychiatry from University of California, described this conclusion emerging from the Copenhagen Interpretation: As Peter Archibald cracked, No phenomenon is a phenomenon until it is an observed phenomenon. Schwartz, Sharon Begley, The Mind and The Brain:Neuroplasticity and the Force of Mental Force, Regan Books, 2003, p. 274 In summary, quantum mechanics' all conventional interpretations depend on the existence of a perceiving being.
Roger Penrose, The Path to Reality, Alfred A. 1031 Amit Goswami expanded on this insight: Suppose we ask, Is the moon there when we are not receiving note of at it? To extent that the moon is ultimately a quantum object being composed entirely of quantum objects, we should speak noso says physicist David Mermin. Perhaps the highest many important, and the highest many insidious, assumption that we absorb in our childhoods is that regarding the fabric world of objects existing out thereindependent of subjects, who are the observers. There is circumstantial evidence in favor of such an assumption. Whenever we look at the moon, for example, we locate the moon where we expect it along its classically calculated trajectory.
Naturally we project that the moon is always there in space-time, even when we are not looking. Quantum physics saysnumber When we are not looking, the moon's possibility wave spreads, albeit by a minuscule amount. When we look, the wave collapses instantly; thus the wave should not be in space-time. It creates more sense to adapt an idealist metaphysic assumption: There is no object in space-time without a conscious subject receiving note of at it. Goswami, The Self-Aware Universe, pp.
This, of course, applies to our perceptual world. The existence regarding the Moon is of course obvious within the outside world. But when we look at it, all we actually encounter is our own perception regarding the Moon. Schwartz included these lines regarding the fact demonstrated by quantum physics in his pamphlet The Mind and the Brain: The role of observation in quantum physics cannot be emphasized too strongly. In classical physics [Newtonian physics], observed processes have an existence independent regarding the mind that observes and probes them.
In quantum physics, however, only through an act of observation does a physical quantity return to have an actual value. Schwartz and Begley, The Mind and The Brain, p. 264 Schwartz also summarized the views of different physicists on the subject: As Jacob Bronowski wrote in The Ascent of Man, One aim regarding the physical sciences was to release an exact picture regarding the fabric world. One achievement of physics within the twentieth century was to prove that that aim is unattainable. Heisenberg spoke about the concept of objective reality has thus evaporated.
Writing in 1958, he admitted that the laws of nature which we formulate mathematically in quantum theory deal no detailed together with the particles themselves but with our knowledge regarding the elementary particles. It is wrong, Bohr once said, to ponder that the task of physics is to discover out how nature is. Physics concerns what we can speak about nature. Schwartz and Begley, The Mind and The Brain, p. 274 Fred Alan Wolf, one regarding the guest physicists within the documentary film What the Bleep Do We Know? described this similar to fact: What creates up things are not more things.
But what creates up things are ideas, concepts, information. What the Bleep Do We Know?, Documentary film directed by: William Arntz and Betsy Chasse, mns: 0. 28 Following the highest many fascinating and sensitive experiments that the person mind should devise over the course of 80 years, there exists now no views opposed to quantum physics, which was decisively and scientifically proven. No objections can even be suggested against the conclusions reached by the experiments performed. Quantum theory was tested in hundreds of likely different ways devised by scientists.
It has earned the Nobel Prize for a many scientists, and is continuing to do so. Matter, the highest many fundamental concept of Newtonian physics and once regarded unconditionally as the absolute truth, was eliminated. Materialists, supporters regarding the old belief that reason was the sole and definitive building block of existence, were really confused by the fact regarding the lack of reason suggested by quantum physics. They now need to explain all the laws of physics within the sphere of metaphysics. The shock that this inflicted on materialists within the early 20th century was distant greater than should be expressed in these lines.
But the quantum physicists Bryce DeWitt and Neill Graham describe it: No development of modern science has had a more profound impact on person thinking than the advent of quantum theory. Wrenched out of centuries-old thought patterns, physicists of a generation ago located themselves compelled to embrace an special metaphysics. The distress which this reorientation caused continues to present day. Basically physicists have suffered a severe loss; their hold on reality. Nick Herbert, Elemental Mind: Person Consciousness and the New Physics In conclusion, the truth disclosed by science is this: Reason and time have been brought into being by an independent possessor of immense power, by a Creator, Allah.
No comments:
Post a Comment