The Nothing Universe By Dennis James Huff Introduction In this paper, I shall discuss and give logical evidence for an unique theory of how the universe began. One that is supported by all regarding the evidence in help regarding the Large Bang Theory. This theory is called, Nothing Universe theory. During my years of education, I learned the 3 most well-known theories regarding the day. The greatest well-known of which was, and still is, the Large Bang Theory.
The only credit I can bring myself to release the Large Bang Theory is that it is a possibility. I do not make that statement lightly, I have pondered and followed the Large Bang theory for many years. What keeps the Large Bang Theory alive is the scientific evidence that points to it as the greatest plausible explanation. The question that wants to be regarded is, Is it logically plausible, or plausible for lack of an improved theory? Just as forensic evidence can sometimes spot to wrong suspect, so to can scientific evidence. Just as I am sure there exists higher than a little innocent men and women in prison, I am also sure that there is a theory or 3 that remain well-known today, basically based upon good studies attributed to wrong conclusions.
The one sticking spot for me with the Large Bang Theory is the Prior to Period. What existed prior to the singularity exploded? If it were not for that sticking point, I should have had an easier time accepting the Large Bang Theory; and the Nothing Universe theory should not exist. The Oscillating Universe theory is nice, but it has similar problem; assuming there ever definitely was a beginning. If the universe has always existed then it is a plausible theory. However; I locate it difficult to believe, due to the fact that something should have had to set this not ever ending loop in motion.
This is not necessarily a true statement. I hold a hard time conceiving of how the universe should expand and contract continuously without possessing been set in motion at some spot within the past. This notion points to a beginning at some spot within the past. Similar holds true for the Steady State Universe theory. The notion that the universe has always existed and shall always exist the method it has for all eternity shall also be a difficult thing to conceive.
The large challenge with this theory is that we have knowledge of the universe is not unchanging. It is expanding and continuously changing on an everyday basis. Some have suggested that consequently it is expanding the overall picture remains the same. I disagree, stars are born and die, objects collide, are sucked into black holes, etc. We live in a very active and continuously changing universe.
I shall give an in depth overview of all 3 currently accepted theories followed by Nothing Universe theory. I shall also give a brief discussion of God, basically due to the fact that I know that the subject cannot be discounted. irregardless of how unlikely the existence of one shall be. I have knowledge of that The god is a subject that many people shall not should touch upon. I know that when considering the beginning of all things the subject must, at the very least, be briefly covered.
What I am about to propose in this cardboard is an plan that I have regarded for many years. It is a theory that I know in, and has helped me return to an improved understanding of our universe. I have spent roughly 15 years considering, and developing this theory. It goes beyond the sticking spot of, the Prior to Period. The time prior to the singularity or the existence of a God.
In my opinion there exists only 3 current theories that make sense. There is the Nothing Universe theory, and there is the theory of God. The The god concept does still suffer from the Prior to problem, but that should just be by design. No reason how hard I rack my brain I just cannot return to any other conclusions. Neither the Nothing theory is correct, the correct theory has not been written, or The god is responsible for everything.
I shall also explain this spot further. I shall do this by outlining a plausible argument for the existence of a god, and howcome it is so difficult for science to ever destroy the notion of a God. I do not know fully in a The god myself, but the nature of a The god creates it virtually impossible to discount its existence entirely. These were the choices I gave myself, and for now I am going to stick with my conclusions. My goal now is to share my theory with the world, and try to give a full and in depth understanding of this new theory.
I know that this theory neatly ties together all regarding the lose ends of existence. With a simple understanding of our beginnings, we shall be can gain full insight into the inner workings of our reality. I should also like to say, Pride of Authorship. Hold this in mind as you view this paper. New plans are not readily or with no problems accepted due to many factors.
Pride of Authorship basically place is; outright refusal to know in an unique plan or topic if it threatens an individuals current body of work or belief structure. Denial of an unique plan based upon person emotions is not a good method to approach any topic. I basically should like my plans to be considered, as I have regarded other's plans and works. I should also like to sum that the earth was once flat, ether was responsible for fire, and plate tectonics was an absurd concept. Nothing Universe theory shall also appear to be an absurd concept, however; I am not seeking belief.
I am only seeking consideration. The Large Bang Theory The Large Bang theory was first proposed by Georges Lemaitre. He formulated his theory based upon observations regarding the structure regarding the universe and from the theoretical considerations at the time. Doppler shift was two of those observations, first measured in 1912 by Visto Slipher. He observed that galaxies appeared to be moving distant from the earth.
The result was Doppler shift. As the objects move distant from us, varying wavelengths grow to elongated and reach us as dark brown light. It is how we have knowledge of our universe is expanding. Lemaitre regarded Doppler Shift and in 1931 concluded that if the universe is expanding currently then it should be logical to assume that the universe was once very small. You should reverse the expansion until you reached a primeval atom.
This atom has return to be known as the singularity. As we approach this time within the past the current laws of physics cease to exist the farther return we go. If we were to obtain as close as likely to this singularity then our laws of physics hold true. When we reach that moment, we reach a spot where nothing but the singularity exists. From this spot onward the traditional laws of physics do not apply.
I know this spot is termed as the Planck Epoch. Once the singularity is reached the consensus is that we should perceive an infinitely mini and infinitely dense spot of pure energy. No one can necessarily explain what existed beyond the boundaries of this singularity. Many know that nothing existed, but the singularity. We also cannot leave anywhere beyond the spot of its existence.
We do not have knowledge of where the singularity came from, and we do not have knowledge of if anything existed prior to it. The well-known view is: that there was nothing prior to the singularity the singularity came into existence the singularity then expanded instantaneously This is a very important spot to consider. Many assume from the title regarding the theory that the universe began in an explosion. That shall have been the belief within the past, but not today. Many tend to view the Large Bang like a sudden expansion regarding the singularity and not an explosion.
Imagine a done circle on a piece of cardboard with an 8 inch diameter. Now imagine that this circle expanded outward in an instant to a diameter of 80 inches. This should represent how the universe began. The singularity expanded to make our current universe. Since we have knowledge of that the universe is still expanding today; one should assume that the large bang is still receiving location today.
It should also be that the expansion of space has stopped, but the momentum of fabric has not. We should also assume that it is slowing down, but recent observations appear to display that the expansion is speeding up, and not slowing down. The 3 biggest discoveries that have provided strength to this theory is that the universe is expanding, and that background radiation exists all around us. This background radiation cosmic background radiation is thought to be evidence of a good explosion or expansion, lending help to Large Bang theory. Other supporting evidence was discovered, such as; the abundance of simple elements within the universe, namely hydrogen and helium.
the evolution and distribution of reason in our universe That is not many of a list, but these 3 plans and the 3 mentioned previously seem to be the primary supporting topics for the Large Bang theory. Many more work was done where the conclusions fit into the framework of a large bang universe. This work does not directly prove the large bang, it basically is proven to be so, and also happens to not contradict the large bang. For example, I should locate out how an object appears on a pantry table. In this instance the object is a glass.
Assuming a glass shall appear repeatedly at some spot within the future, I wait around. Eventually, I observe that an lone enters the room and spots a glass on the table. Now I have knowledge of how the glass came to be on the table. Now, lets assume there shall also be a well-known theory that we live on a planet. The discovery of how the glass came to be where it was has nothing to do with the theory that we live on a planet.
Since the appearance regarding the glass happened on this planet, it fits nicely with that theory of a planet, but we set out to prove how a glass came to be at that location. We proved that hypothesis without threatening our planet theory. This is an over simplified explanation for a not so simple topic. Let us think about the evidence for the large bang theory. We have knowledge of that a bulk of our universe is composed of simple reason for example hydrogen and helium.
The majority of our periodic table of elements is composed of elements that make up a very mini percentage of our universe. This is due to the fact that more complex elements should be formed within an above life environment, in this case a star. The evolution of elements in our universe should look like this; Protons and electrons came together to shape hydrogen Hydrogen gathered into huge clouds of hydrogen eventually this hydrogen compressed until stars are formed in these stars hydrogen is fused to shape helium the high temperatures in stars give a location for more complex elements to be formed a star dies, explodes, elements are scattered and new stars are born from this cloud now we have elements to shape not only gas giants, but rocky planets as well This is a simplistic view, but paints a simple picture of how reason evolved from the beginning to today. The universe is estimated to be around 15 billion years old, that is plenty of time for elements to evolve. Mostly when you think about that it only took life 4 billion years to obtain us here.
That is only a fifth of our universes existence. The other 5 fifths was used within the creation of stars, death, and evolution of elements to bring us to a spot where the elements should begin an unique evolution. The evolution of life on Earth and perhaps other planets. Cosmic Background radiation was witnessed by all of us who have ever listened to an off space radio station, or watched an off space television station. The hissing sound that you hear on the radio is caused by background radiation, and likewise with the fuzz on your off space television screen.
It was definitely discovered as noise that should not be eliminated during an experiment. Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson were working for Bell labs in 1964 when they created the discovery. They were creating use of a super sensitive Horn Antenna to detect radio waves that were bouncing of off echo balloon satellites. They had to eliminate all interference, and were successful for the greatest part. They should not seem to eliminate a little position hissing sound, no reason how hard they tried.
This little position hissing sound turned out to be Cosmic background radiation left over from the birth of our universe. This was hailed as the fingerprint regarding the Large Bang theory. It points to a massive function that created our universe. An function that released unbelievable amounts of energy. Consequently that should be true, and we do have knowledge of of its existence; it is likely that another function should account for background radiation.
A good deal of studies was done on the subject regarding the large bang. As with any theory there exists some wrinkles that should be ironed out. All theories have wrinkles and sticking points, some higher than others. The Large Bang has remained strong, due to the fact that it has fewer wrinkles than other proposed theories and hypothesis. This fact coupled with the evidence that was attributed to it, it shall remain the leading theory for some time to come.
It is not the first, and shall not be the final theory that is held to be true. Even though it should be wrong. Oscillating Universe Theory Perhaps the 2nd most believed theory for the beginning of our universe. It was conceived by Alexander Friedman in 1922, and remains fairly intact today. The primary sticking spot with this theory is the assumption that we live in a closed universe.
Presently, most scientist know that we do not live in a closed universe. I speak most, due to the fact that I knew a science teacher once who believed that whether you had a tough enough telescope you should be can look the return of that you own head! The easiest method to view this theory is to ponder regarding the Large Bang occurring over and over again, each time ending in a large crunch, followed by a large bang. At some spot within the past the singularity expanded leading to creation regarding the universe. Eventually, the universe began to slow and then contract. Ultimately this universe should end in a large crunch, and then should eventually expand again; leading to an unique universe that should end in a large crunch, and so on and so forth.
The primary reason howcome this theory was not as accepted as the Large Bang theory is, that many do not look a difference between this theory and the large bang. Howcome think about the possibility that we are many universes along within the cycle? When we can basically look at this universe, and its beginning and likely end. The conclusion being, that we do not should focus on a repeating pattern. We should be within first universe or the 100th within the cycle, it does not matter. What we are interested in is how this universe began, how old it is, and how it shall end.
This cycle matters to us due to the fact that we live in it. So, as tempting as it is to think about that this universe is only one in an extended line of universes; we should wait focused on this universe. For this reason, many have chosen to only think about the Large Bang theory. In reality the Large Bang theory should be a subset regarding the Oscillating Universe Theory. Steady State Theory This theory takes a view regarding the universe as; always possessing existed, and shall always exist.
The universe exists currently as it did millions, billions, trillions of years ago. There is no beginning, and there is no end. Developed in 1948 by Fred Hoyle, Hermann Bondi and Thomas Gold, it was proposed as an alternative to Large Bang theory. It proposes that new reason is continuously created as the universe expands. This dealt with the notion that our universe was expanding and so new reason should be wanted for the universe to remain relatively the same.
This theory should not escape observational fact. The universe was changing, was expanding, and there was nothing steady state about it. It was an interesting concept that had its supporters. It still suffers from similar questions that all theories of its kind do. Was there a beginning? Even if the universe has always existed, where did everything return from? How can something have always been when we have knowledge of that our universe is dominated by beginnings and endings? Conceptually it tried to deal with these questions.
We would not should think about a prior to time if there was no such time. Similar shall be spoke about for the end. You cannot have one if the universe shall not ever end. Strangely, We can conceive of an infinity subsequent to a beginning, but not an infinity with no beginning that also has an end. Does this arise from our linear habit of thinking?.
This concludes the 3 large theories for the beginning of our universe. The Large Bang is the simple fore runner with the other 3 only possessing a minority of supporters left. There exists many other lesser known theories out their that shall be located with little studies by any interested persons. The Nothing Universe This theory is not a well known or accepted theory, due to the fact that it is an unique theory. I call it a theory rather than a hypothesis, due to the fact that the evidence that exists for the Large Bang theory also supports this theory.
That is to speak that; My theory accounts for many of what the large bang theory does, as well as little of what the large bang theory does not account for. If I am articulate enough, I shall be can convey the strengths of this theory, and howcome it should be regarded at the very fewest like a running mate with the Large Bang theory. Perhaps the day shall return when the Nothing Universe theory shall stand alone, but I have knowledge of how difficult it is to dethrone currently accepted and popularly held beliefs. We are all familiar with our person concept of nothing. When a bottle is empty, we say; Nothing is within the bottle.
We have knowledge of that this is not definitely the case. What we are referring to is the fact that what we thought should be within the bottle is no detailed there. Sequential for nothing to truly be within the bottle, the bottle itself should should contain a vacuum. A vacuum is the done absence of matter. The only thing that can exist in a vacuum is energy.
A vacuum is the true concept of nothing, but it is not the true shape of nothing. What I propose is that our concept of nothing and the true state of nothing are 3 different things. The true state of nothing is neutrality. A balance between charges in a perfectly arranged atom. This done atom I have named the Nothing Atom.
two Hold in mind that the above figure shall not be the exact structure regarding the nothing atom. It is merely a representation of how the nothing atom should have, or shall have existed. The key spot to take from this figure is; that the nothing atom was composed of most reason and antimatter. Each was kept from destroying the other by neutrons with the electrons and positrons occupying different orbital lobes. The arrangement of this atom shall have been distant more complex than this model that I have proposed.
I shall explain this atom in distant detail in a moment. It shall also be that these particles did not exist in an atom. Nothing Universe shall have been composed of an ocean of particles locked together in a method not to destroy one another. Antimatter and reason being separated by neutrons. I take the view spot that the Nothing Atom did exist, and shall do so in this theory.
It shall also be important to note that this atom is the very existence, structure, and substance of nothing. There was no beginning, due to the fact that this atom was the actual state regarding the universe, prior to the creation regarding the universe that we have knowledge of today. When I speak that Nothing existed, what I really mean is that nothing but the done atom existed. The nothing atom that permeated all of space. In a sense, the universe we live in currently represents the very definition of something existence, while the pre-universe Nothing Universe represented the very definition of nothing.
Picture these atoms in an arrangement that allowed for as little free space as likely between them, and occupying all regarding the pre-universe in all directions. Contrary to Large Bang theory and the singularity, no free life existed in this Nothing Universe. All life was contained within this sea of nothing atoms. So, rather than a singularity expanding out into space, we instead have our universe expanding within a pre-universe. A done nothing universe.
Our universe contains free life and a ton of space and is bounded by a universe with no free life and no free space. The nothing atom that exists beyond our universe is composed of most reason and anti reason particles joined together and separated by neutrons. The nothing atom is composed regarding the proton, the neutron, the electron, as well as their anti reason counterparts. They can be all locked together and kept from destroying each other by neutrons. I do not have knowledge of the exact arrangement of these particles in this done atom, but that is irrelevant.
All that is important is the concept that they can be all locked together in this one done Nothing Atom. The electron and the positron do not annihilate each other, due to the fact that they occupy different orbital lobes. Again, I do not fully understand the exact arrangement of this atom; only that it existed. Whatever the done arrangement is, this perfectly neutral Nothing Atom is the only thing that existed within the pre-universe and composed infinity entirely. There was no motion and that is why no time, but we can use the concept of infinity to release us an plan regarding the state regarding the universe up until the spot regarding the event.
So now we have the done nothing universe composed entirely regarding the neutral and done Nothing Atom. All life is locked up tight within the shape of particles creating up this nothing universe. upon trillions, upon trillions, upon trillions, of these atoms. An infinite sea of atoms in which one can fall apart. two of these atoms in an ocean of infinity destabilized and led to Function and the creation of our universe.
Something had to happen in just two of these done Nothing Atoms to cause it to destabilize. Something had to make a destabilization of one regarding the particles within the atom to lead to an irreversible chain reaction that should lead to birth regarding the known universe. I refer to this as the EVENT. This smoking gun should very well be one regarding similar forces responsible for radioactive decay. I am referring to one regarding the Quantum forces that dictate how particles behave on a sub atomic level.
These are the Tough Nuclear Force, the Weak Nuclear Force, and the Electrostatic Force. A slight shift in two of these forces should have led to destabilization of two of these done Nothing Atoms. The consequence of this was a chain reaction that should make our universe and continue on forever. The Function The function represents the exact moment when the chaos began. I have return up with a theory to explain this based upon the concept of probability.
Statistically speaking, one should should assume that when you can be dealing with infinity; the probability of two function occurring is two in infinity. That is to speak that if an function can occur, however improbable; a chance still exists for its occurrence when infinity is taken into consideration. I shall now quote two of my former geology professors, Dr. Eastler, due to the fact that I know this quote sums up my concept regarding the function nicely. He said, It did not should happen, but it had to happen.
Basically put, it happened due to the fact that everything exists, and if it did not happen than we would not be around to have knowledge of the difference. Since we are here, it is safe to assume that something did happen and the Function shall have been two of those such things. This Function shall have been caused by a shift in one regarding the Quantum Forces. Once this one neutral Nothing atom destabilized, it set into motion a chain reaction that should lead to greatest lone explosion that shall ever occur within the the past of reality. During this Function more life was released than all regarding the life currently contained within all regarding the reason in our universe.
Some call it the Large Bang, I call it; The Event. 2 This is not a singularity exploding into existence, this is an atom setting off a chain reaction in an ocean of done atoms. It is not only an expansion of space, it is an explosion of space. This reaction is instantaneous and is, I believe; the only function currently occurring in our universe at a velocity greater than that regarding the velocity of light. There exists a little possibilities to think about for this.
The nothing atoms are arranged so closely together that once the chain reaction begins it is instantaneous. This is howcome we do not look the light emanating from this expansion of our universe. I propose that if we should venture fast enough and distant enough out into space we should eventually return to a wall of life moving distant from us. I should call this the Function Horizon but that name is already taken so I shall refer to it as the Creation Wave. This wall of life is the boundary between our universe and the nothing universe.
On the other side of this wall of life is the universe as it existed prior to the event. An endless sea of done nothing atoms awaiting their turn to be annihilated by the impending Creation Wave. This means that our universe is being born as we speak, and shall continue to be born for eternity. This shall also explain observations that our universe is not slowing down, but accelerating as it expands outward. The creation wave is essentially pulling the reason behind it outward due to ongoing expansion, and or the immense gravity regarding the nothing universe on the other side regarding the creation wave.
Another possibility is that the farther out into space we go, the younger our universe is. This means that the center of our universe is the oldest, while the outer edges are the youngest. Since the creation wave passed through that region of space fairly recently, the outer regions appear to still be accelerating. It should be that the closer we get to creation wave; reason is flying distant from us at greater and greater speeds. This creation wave is a not ever ending wave of destruction moving distant from the center regarding the known universe at mind boggling speed.
This expansion also helps to explain howcome there is so many empty space out there. The universe we have knowledge of is expanding outward to fill empty space, where empty space had not ever existed. A universe full of reason and life in our universe and reason and life within the anti universe. That is assuming that an anti-matter universe was created along with the reason universe we live in today. I do think about this possibility.
It shall also be that reason outnumbered anti reason within the nothing atom, leading to massive explosions of reason anti-matter interactions soon subsequent to the event. Eventually reason won out, and anti reason was destroyed leaving us with a reason universe. I have possibilities to release as to howcome we are not blinded by and vaporized by the life being released by this process. One possibility is that the mass regarding the nothing universe on the other side regarding the Creation wave is infinitely great. This causes the light from the function to be bent return towards the nothing universe as the Creation wave moves forward.
The 2nd possibility is that the Creation wave is so distant distant from us now that the light emitted from this function cannot reach our region of space any longer. The only evidence left behind is within the shape of Cosmic Background radiation. A third possibility is, that the creation wave is moving so fast; at speeds faster than that of light, that light waves grow to so elongated that they do not appear in our known spectrum. These incredibly long waves shall be located distant to left, on the Electromagnetic Spectrum. These are not radio waves, they can be super radio waves.
The only real evidence for this function shall be located within the shape of Cosmic Background Radiation. It is the thumb print of this ultimate atomic explosion. That is not to speak that if we develop the capability to look distant enough out into space that we shall not catch a glimpse or some evidence of this light, but I highly doubt it. We should be can detect the incredibly long radio waves that should be emanating throughout space. This Creation wave was traveling outwards at a velocity greater than that regarding the velocity of light for well over 15 billion years now.
It shall not be likely to detect the outer boundary of our universe any detailed directly. We shall still be can detect it indirectly. Distant supporting evidence for Nothing Universe theory shall be located within the evolution of atoms throughout the universe. The closer towards the center of our universe we shall locate more evolved forms of matter. We should locate older stars and celestial bodies.
There should be more galaxies and galaxy clusters indicating that this region of space has had detailed to leave through the processes compulsory for these formations. The closer we get to outer, younger regions regarding the universe, we should locate fewer galaxies and galaxy clusters. That is due to the fact that this region of space is younger and has not had the time compulsory to develop as distant along as the older, central region of our universe. One should imagine the center regarding the universe containing good clusters of galaxies, thinning out the farther distant from the central spot we move until we reach the huge expanses of hydrogen clouds that occupy the outer rim. This, younger region of space should contain hydrogen clouds trillions of light years across.
Within these huge clouds exists nurseries where young stars are forming and coming to life. Another function occurred at the exact moment that the Creation wave began its long journey outward and forever. At the exact moment the chain reaction began not just one, but 3 universes shall have been created. This is assuming similar amounts of reason or anti-matter and that as soon as the nothing atom separated that its reason anti reason components occupied separate universes. First universe is the reason universe and the 2nd universe was the anti-matter universe.
These 3 universes exist on 3 separate planes that I like to refer to as the Above and Below planes of existence. The Central Plane is where the nothing universe existed in one dimension and in done harmony. As soon as the Function occurred the majority of anti reason phased into an unique dimension, or plane of existence. Similarly all regarding the reason in our known universe phased into its own plane of existence. I have designated the reason universe as the Above plane, and I have designated the anti-matter universe the Below plane.
This is strictly done to give a view of how these 3 universes shall exist. This shall not be, in reality, the true or exact structure. These are 3 separate universes, two of that is composed of matter, and the other of anti-matter. 4 Another method to possibly picture these 3 universes as existing simultaneously should be to envision all regarding the reason arranged the method it is in our reason universe. Then imagine that the anti reason that is arranged within the anti-matter universe occupies the empty pockets of space in our universe.
So, whether you look out into space now in our universe you can notice that there is very many of empty space out there. Similar is true for the anti reason universe. Reason in one universe occupies the empty space regarding the other universe and vice versa. We perceive it as empty space, due to the fact that the other universe exists on an alternate plane of existence or an alternate dimension. This is one other possibility.
This model shall also help to explain howcome there is not enough reason to account for gravity. Dark reason was suggested to attribute for this gravity or visible reason disparity. It should be that even though anti reason exists in another dimension, its gravitational influence shall still be felt in our dimension and vice versa. A link shall also exist between these 3 planes. This link shall be located within the shape of a black hole.
A black holes gravity is so intense that it literally punches a hole into that other dimension. Just as anti reason is spewed out into our reason dimension from a black hole; I know that reason is spewed forth from similar black hole into anti-matter space. A black hole shall represent a bridge between these 3 dimensions. Whether you can imagine a reason black hole bridging the gap and creating a wormhole that is linked to its counterpart or anti reason black hole. Perhaps they can be one and similar or perhaps they occupy similar space at similar time.
These 3 black holes being linked by a stable wormhole or perhaps black holes are connected to sleek holes. Perhaps sleek holes exist in most the reason and anti reason universes as the outlets or the transfer between the 3 universes. 5 Black holes also share a very common link to state regarding the universe within the very beginning and that is its very intense gravitational field. This field exists due to sheer quantity of reason contained with in a mini no. The difference is that there was no free life within the neutral universe, all life was locked up in particles contained within the done atom.
If there were any free space in that neutral universe, no doubt the gravity should be of a strength we have not ever prior to witnessed. A super black hole should pale in comparison. Clearly these are possibilities to be considered. The state of our universe currently is that of chaos in an unbalanced universe. Similar is true within the anti reason universe, if it exists.
The universe that we have knowledge of currently is trying to return to that neutral state. That is howcome atoms strive for balance. It shall also explain howcome elements seek a decreased state of energy. As elements grow to heavier and heavier, they take on a radioactive nature. Elements for example plutonium and uranium seek a decreased life state by emitting alpha, beta quanta, and gamma rays.
An internal or external life function is all it takes to set radioactive decay into motion. Once it is completed, a decreased life state particle is left behind. First is referred to as the Parent Nuclide with the decreased life Daughter Nuclide left in its place. Quantum physics governs this process. The 3 forces that govern the subatomic world are the tough nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, and the electrostatic force.
two of these forces shall have been responsible for the Function that was started by the destabilization of one regarding the done Nothing Atoms. The elements that exist currently are thanks to this destabilization. Many similar method one regarding the 4 sub atomic forces are responsible for sure variations of radioactive decay. The process should leave like this; One regarding the 4 quantum forces destabilized two nothing atom life was released to surrounding atoms this life release led to an infinite and not ever ending chain reaction the creation wave continued outward forever What was left behind were protons, neutrons and electrons in this universe, anti-protons, neutrons, and anti electrons within the anti universe. If an anti universe does not exist than perhaps this region of space is only dominated by reason with other galaxies being composed of anti matter.
Our universe should then contain galaxies and galaxy clusters composed of matter, while others are composed of anti-matter. Neither way, the evolution of reason should play out similar way. It is reasonable to assume that the laws of physics should remain similar for most a reason or an anti-matter universe. Since anti reason is nothing higher than mirror particles with opposite charge. Protons and electrons should return together to shape hydrogen.
Hydrogen should condense to shape stars. Helium and other elements should shape in these stars, creating the universe as we look it today. In a sense our elements were first things that began to evolve in our universe, ultimately leading to elements compulsory for the evolution of life. In this method a simple picture shall be drawn with particles forming elements, elements forming planets, and elements combining in an unique method and in an unique environment to release rise to life. On earth, elements came together to shape lone celled organisms and from their life evolved.
It takes huge amounts of life to make the higher elements on the periodic table of elements. Elements continuously seek a decreased life state. The lowest life state for any element is the proton and the electron. These components were once locked up as component regarding the nothing atom. Since we have knowledge of that hydrogen and helium are the greatest abundant elements within the universe than it is safe to assume that huge amounts of life were wanted to lead to creation regarding the higher elements.
Howcome then do we assume that a particle created and then detected in a lab existed within the beginning regarding the universe? Yes, they exist, but not necessarily independent regarding the Nothing Atom. The large bang theory supposes that a singularity existed. This singularity was nothing but pure life and it was soon subsequent to the expansion that these exotic particles existed and disappeared as the universe cooled. That is one likely view. Another view should be that, the universe was very cold within the beginning.
All free life was locked up tight, and these exotic particles only existed as the subatomic constituents regarding the particles that created up the Nothing Atom. If they exist currently we shall locate them emanating from stars or other high life events receiving location in our universe. Somewhere, where sufficient life is available to make these exotic particles. The possibility remains that the particles we make in a lab does not necessarily lead us to conclusion that they existed during the birth of our universe. We have knowledge of of their existence due to the fact that we make and observe them in a lab.
We as person beings have created many things that did not exist until we arranged their elements to make them so. Wood has always existed within the shape of trees, but it took humans to make a log cabin. We have knowledge of that subatomic particles exist, but due to the fact that we detected them in a particle experiment. We have knowledge of they exist, due to the fact that we have knowledge of that protons, electrons, and neutrons have smaller constituent parts. I maintain that every exotic particle we have detected can exist, and shall exist, just shall not have existed within the beginning of our universe as free sub atomic particles.
The subatomic particles that did exist were locked up within the nothing atom within the shape of reason and anti matter. The fact that we detect them in a particle accelerator should be due to nothing higher than the fact that they can exist independently, and we give the environment to make them for detection. Subatomic particles within the beginning of our universe were locked up within the done Nothing Atom. Howcome The god can neither be proven or disprove I myself do not personally know in God, but I have knowledge of the possibility shall always remain, regardless of how illogical it shall seem. If a the god is an all knowing and all powerful being than it is reasonable to assume that it should foresee the current debates of today.
If faith is as important as it is supposed to be then it should also be reasonable to assume that any The god should should set things up the method they can be currently to test that faith. A The god shall set the universe up such that the evidence to contrary of its existence should be overwhelming. This should need an extreme no. of faith from any believer of that God. Some should call it blind faith, the reality is that faith is what it is.
There is no concrete evidence for such a God's existence. Some shall spot to last testament or other piece of ancient work, but I should like to ask howcome Greek gods are relegated to mythology when plenty of ancient writings exist of them? Just as the Large Bang theory is the greatest well-known theory while other theories exist, similar shall be spoke about for Christianity, and the Islamic religions. They can be the greatest popularly held theories while other theories of religion exist as well. It does not reason what evidence a scientist points to as evidence against religion. The fact remains that a The god shall have set the universe up exactly the method it is to test Faith.
A The god should have created the fossil record, plate tectonics, carbon dating, dark brown shift, and an entire host of other well-known scientific evidences against religion. Heck, a the god should have created the universe at this very instant and we should not ever have knowledge of it. All of our the past possessing been planted as memories upon our creation. It shall also very well be that these similar to scientific discoveries are nothing more the the discovery of how a The god drafted and set up the Universe. This is the primary dilemma that science faces and shall not ever truly be can overcome.
Similar kind of argument shall be created for religion against science. Since there is no solid or concrete evidence for the existence of a God. Scientists can spot to fossil record, carbon dating, etc and we leave round and round. This argument between The god and science shall forever remain like a stalemate. Neither side can entirely prove or disprove the others arguments.
Conclusions I cannot speak that the universe shall not ever return to neutral state regarding the nothing universe. The fact remains that 15 billion years shall only be a split 2nd subsequent to the Function on a universal time scale. We shall still be witnessing the very early stages of our universes existence. Perhaps one day events shall take location within the universe to let for a pocket of nothing fabric or neutral reason to form. Perhaps it shall grow slowly over time, creating an unique neutral universe inside of an ever expanding universe, surrounded by first neutral universe.
Perhaps this wave of balance and chaos was going on for some time, and the space that we are familiar with exists between two of these waves. This should be Oscillating Universe application regarding the Nothing Universe theory. The whole of existence is balanced as pockets of nothing reason within our universe that is growing within first nothing universe. These processes receiving location on such a scale that we cannot even begin to comprehend the no. of time we are dealing with.
I personally know that we are living within first universe and the only one that shall exist. Howcome deal with Oscillation in this case, when we did not with the Large Bang? The reason and anti reason universes possibly existing on separate planes, exchanging reason and anti reason with one another through different processes for example black holes. I cannot conceive of this universe ever returning to a balanced neutral nothing universe again. My belief is that we live in this infant universe, first to exist in infinity, and shall exist in infinity from this spot on. As I stated prior to though, you can not ever rule out possibilities.
The possibility that reason in our universe shall begin to collapse in on itself shall occur at some distant spot within the future. If the Creation wave gets distant enough distant from the center regarding the universe then perhaps its gravitational influence shall drop below that regarding the influence of near by galaxies and all reason in between. The universe should then begin to collapse in on itself, reform the neutral universe and the the function should occur at some spot in an even more distant and mind boggling future. Like I said, I envision our universe as expanding inside regarding the neutral Nothing universe. At similar time the anti reason universe is doing similar thing on its own plane of existence, if it exists.
3 universe, one to represent the reason universe that we live in, and the other within the anti reason universe. One should should assume that the laws of physics should exist in many similar method in most universes. I assume it does based on the fact that anti reason should interact many similar method that reason does in our universe. This is my working theory regarding the beginning regarding the universe. It is not concrete, but represents what shall have been the state regarding the universe prior to the beginning.
As with the Large Bang theory, it shall be and should be improved upon as time goes on. I also know that similar evidence that shall give to prove the Large Bang theory shall also give to prove my hypothesis. The evidence is not wrong, they can be scientific methods that have been conducted over and over only to return to similar to conclusion. The evidence is entirely correct; I maintain that the conclusion that the evidence is attributed to is wrong. Cosmic Background Radiation should be expected within the Nothing Universe Theory.
This huge explosion of our universe within the nothing universe should leave this background radiation behind. The fact that the universe is still expanding currently also fits within my Nothing Universe model. It also sends a likely explanation for howcome our universe is accelerating outward and not slowing down. Since the reaction is still occurring within the farthest reaches of space, the center of our universe should be moving slower than the outer reaches of our universe. So, when we look distant out the faster things are moving outward.
The Nothing Universe also accounts for the distribution of elements in our universe. Subsequent to the function we were left with huge quantities of protons and electrons. These particles came together to shape hydrogen. Hydrogen formed stars and gave rise to helium, the 2nd most abundant element in our universe. Finally, the evolution and distribution of reason should possibly be accounted for by the Nothing Universe theory.
Huge clouds of hydrogen came together to shape stars. Helium and higher elements are formed. All the while these stars a clustered together into galaxies based upon distance and distribution. Provided enough time we end up with our current state regarding the universe. THE BIG BANG THEORY IS ACCEPTED BASED UPON CRITERIA THAT I HAVE OUTLINED AND SHOWN TO ALSO SUPPORT THE NOTHING UNIVERSE THEORY.
The only logical conclusion should be that it, at the very least; be allowed to stand on equal ground with the Large Bang Theory. Possibilities Throughout this cardboard I place forth many possibilities as to how events shall have played out when the universe was created according to Nothing Universe Theory. I have done so, due to the fact that it should be irresponsible for me to present only one concrete set of events. Room should be left when considering a theory that deals with the creation regarding the Universe. Within the case of Nothing Theory I had to first think about the overall sequence of events, and then try to convey how those events played out.
Along with this, I had to also think about all regarding the many possibilities that shall have taken location during each critical step within the theory. I know that I have done so while still conveying the overall theme regarding the theory. That being spoke about the following is the outline, as I look it, for the Nothing Universe Theory. Possibilities not included. The Nothing Universe exists composed entirely of Nothing Atoms.
No free life exists in this Nothing Universe, and free space is limited to micro spaces between the arrangement of this sea of atoms. One regarding the 3 sub atomic forces Tough Nuclear, Weak Nuclear, Electrostatic shifted and destabilized one Nothing Atom. This destabilization caused the Function and led to Creation Wave. The creation wave is a wall of life expanding outward from the spot regarding the Function and is traveling faster than the velocity of light. Reason particles remained in our universe while anti reason particles entered the anti reason universe.
These are 3 dimensions that now exist subsequent to only one dimension had previously existed. Protons and electrons came together to shape hydrogen. Hydrogen compressed to shape stars. Within these stars other elements were created in smaller quantities. Over time these higher life elements formed the planets, moons, comets, and other non star objects in our universe.
Galaxies shape and within these galaxies solar processes form, and within two of these solar processes the earth was forming. On this planet amino acids formed protein, eventually leading to first simple cells. From their life continued to evolve. 3 billion years and we have life as it exists today. Life that exists within a universe that sprang forth from the Nothing Universe.
Dennis James Huff 2008.
No comments:
Post a Comment